Rushed back to IFB for this performance at 6pm. It's created by Lin Htet from Theatre of the Disturbed.
Oh boy. Really problematic performance. We'll probably be talking about it a lot tomorrow (i.e. 6 Jan), so I won't critique it here. I'll try to give you an objective description instead, shall I?

Prelude: 64 male volunteers were gathered at IFB from lunchtime onwards - one for each of the 64 years Myanmar's had a military dictatorship. By the time we were seated, they were all standing on stage, faces wrapped in masks, arms wrapped in bandages: the guise of protesters.

Act 1 (15-30 minutes): Monks in red robes chanted a (lengthy) blessing. Young people seated in front of the stage poured a libation in memory of those who had died during those 64 years. (No good photos, sorry.)

Act 2 (60-90 minutes): Four public intellectuals are invited on stage to talk with Soe, a member of Theatre of the Disturbed. The intellectuals - including feminists and survivors of the 1988 student protests - sit comfortably around a coffee table and answer questions about nonviolence.
Lin Htet translates.
Lin Htet: How do we as individuals take part in this conflict resolution? Or are we just waiting for the leaders to lead, for the leaders to come so we can follow? The answer was, we are. We are. We are still encountering conflicts. It is still part of human society. We will always encounter conflcits. But as a civilized society, we should be able to overcome conflict without resorting to violence. And I think this form of conflict resolution is the most important concept.

Lin Htet: We try to resolve conflict. But by trying to resolve conflict, are we having another conflict as a consequence? The answer was, well, you have many ways to resolve a conflict. Ia  country, if there is a problem, the gvernng body msut be able to resolve the problem in a very responsible way. In a conflict, there are always two sides. If the governing body favours one side and tries to oppress the other side, there will be an imbalance and it will cause another rproblem as an imbalance in the conflict resolvuiton. But sometimes we need to create another conflict if it’s not properly resolved.

Lin Htet: This is the 21st century, so is violence necessary in resolving conflict? And if violence is necessary, then to what extent should it be tolerated? And the answer was, when one individual, one party is cornered, people tend to fight back. Even if you try to hit the dog in the corner, the dog will tyr to fight back. It is like this. Violence can be a resolution, but in a civilized society this is a two-way question. We may tend to use violence, because we are too desperate to find any other solution.
This goes on for a very long time. Bear in mind that the volunteers are still at the back of the stage doing nothing. Eventually they decide to sit, collapsing like a Vanessa Beecroft live installation. I meet one of them during my pee break.
I begin to worry about their welfare. I consider an intervention. I am about to buy them all canned drinks which they can pass amongst themselves at the back of the stage, when the direction of the conversation finally turns to Titus Andronicus itself.
Lin Htet: Even this performance is a conflict between the participants over whether we should play Titus Andronicus with more violence or with less violence. His opinion is we should do Titus Andronicus as it is, because then we can educate this society in a very civilised and very sophisticated manner.
Act 3 (5 min): The lights go out. Actors begin to do Titus Andronicus, but not as it is. 

A half-naked man in a longyi eats ice cream on stage. A half-naked drummer in shorts marches around the audience. A woman pushes a stroller around the audience.
The drummer and the woman meet. The drummer drums. The woman does nothing.

=CURTAIN=

Riding back to the hotel, my bus-mates discussed what we'd seen.

Rachael Swain: The whole xperience gave me a very strong impression of the relationship between art and activism here. It's also about the issues of perofmrance art which are really about looking, movement. If Keng Sen or a Burmese artist whad tried to explain to me the relation between art and activism, I wouldn’t have got it as clearly as I did from that performance. And you ask yourself: was he beng ironic or not?
 


Comments

02/13/2013 20:43

You made my day! I am very happy and relaxed too that I find this blog. I was looking for the matter discussed in blog post. If you have some more blogs on the material please share those as well.

Reply
04/19/2013 13:46

I’m very intimidated from this interesting post. It has astonishing information. I learned a lot of new things which explores my knowledge in various developments. So I must be pleased about your efforts on posting this information. And hope you will keep posting such an informatics articles.

Reply

Very nice and useful information. Why not write a book about this particular subject. For today’s economic variation and be short of of opportunities, it actually will be a very hot topic. Thanks a lot

Reply
04/19/2013 17:49

Very thrilling Article you have posted here, I was so pleased to get a lots of information within a single click. I had a great time reading this post and I found it very informatics. This is such a striking topic that me & my Friends are looking about.

Reply
04/19/2013 18:35

Such a very informatics post, as I have browsed the majority of your posts. But I found this post is almost certainly where I got the most useful information for my research. It is really very interesting to read this particular post. I just would like to say thanks for your great efforts.

Reply



Leave a Reply